HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gielen, A. C. Articles by Kou, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Gielen, A. C. Articles by Kou, J.

Teaching safety: evaluation of a children's village in Maryland.

Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Center for Injury Research and Policy, Baltimore, USA.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate Children's Village, a life safety education facility for children. SETTING: The study took place in Washington County, Maryland, a rural county. METHODS: Eight elementary schools with 20 second grade classrooms (410 students aged 7 and 8) were selected to participate. Using a quasiexperimental design, tests were administered to two cohorts of children before (pretest) and after (post-test) they attended the Children's Village during 1993-4. Parent and teacher surveys were also completed after the program. RESULTS: Among children who attended in December 1993-January 1994, there was a significant improvement in average test scores between the pretest (58% correct) and post-test (78%). Among children who attended in April 1994, there also was a significant improvement in test scores between pretest (74%) and post-test (85%). Among parents, 70% reported that their child learned a great deal at Children's Village and 33% reported having made changes in their home as a result. The parent survey also revealed that 25% of children and 35% of adults did not always wear their seat belts, and 74% of children did not always wear bicycle helmets. Teachers' responses to the program were generally positive. CONCLUSIONS: Children's Village brought together an extensive network of community leaders, parents, and teachers dedicated to safety education of children. The curriculum had a positive impact on children's knowledge and, to a lesser extent, on parents' safety practices. Program impact could be enhanced by more emphasis on automobile restraints and helmets (behaviors that parents reported were not consistently practiced) and by expanding the village services to parents as well as children. Others considering creating similar programs need to identify community leaders willing to commit the time, effort, and resources required to develop and sustain such programs.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R Lamb, M S Joshi, W Carter, G Cowburn, and A Matthews Children's acquisition and retention of safety skills: the Lifeskills program. Inj. Prev., June 1, 2006; 12(3): 161 - 165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E Towner, T Dowswell, and S Jarvis Updating the evidence. A systematic review of what works in preventing childhood unintentional injuries: Part 2 Inj. Prev., September 1, 2001; 7(3): 249 - 253. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E Towner, T Dowswell, and S Jarvis Updating the evidence. A systematic review of what works in preventing childhood unintentional injuries: Part 1 Inj. Prev., June 1, 2001; 7(2): 161 - 164. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. L Dannenberg and C. J Fowler Evaluation of interventions to prevent injuries: an overview Inj. Prev., June 1, 1998; 4(2): 141 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]