HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nakahara, S Articles by Yoshida, K Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nakahara, S Articles by Yoshida, K

Feasibility of standardized injury surveillance and reporting: a comparison of data from four Asian nations

¹ Department of Preventive Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
² Department of International Community Health, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
³ Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
⁴ Department of Management and Information Systems Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, Japan
⁵ Department of Emergency Medicine, Traumatololgy and Toxicology, International Medical Center of Japan, Tokyo, Japan

Dr S Nakahara, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511 Japan; snakahara{at}marianna-u.ac.jp

Background: To address the increasing number of injuries in developing countries, the World Health Organization (WHO) encourages the establishment of hospital-based surveillance systems and systematic data collection. Although a computerized system is preferable in terms of efficiency, many developing countries have difficulty accessing the appropriate resources.

Objectives: To assess the possibility of comparing and sharing data among countries, and then to discuss the possibility of establishing an international data management system through the internet.

Methods: A point-by-point comparison of data directories from injury surveillance systems in Thailand, Cambodia, Sri Lanka, and Japan was conducted using guidelines published by WHO as the standard.

Results: Thailand, Cambodia, and Sri Lanka used data items that are comparable to each other and to WHO guidelines, with few, readily amenable, differences. The Japanese system used quite different data items.

Conclusions: Data comparability suggests the feasibility of a global data management system that can store data from various countries. Such a system, if made accessible over the internet, would benefit resource-constrained countries by providing them with a ready-made framework to implement a surveillance system at low cost.